Classification and Diagnosis of SZ

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: ces
  • Created on: 08-01-16 09:32
View mindmap
  • Issues Associated with the Classification & Diagnosis of SZ
    • Reliability
      • the same person, presenting the same symptoms may be diagnosed by one doctor but not by another
      • diagnosis varies because there are two classification systems; ICD (UK) or DSM (USA)
        • in one book, symptoms must persist for 1 month, and in the other 6 months
        • 5 types of SZ in one book, 7 in the other
      • The aim of Cooper's experiment was to show the difference of diagnosis depending on what classification system you use.
        • 250 patients at a psychiatric ward presented their symptoms to 2 groups of psychiatrists one used the ICD and the other the DCM
          • The group using the ICD diagnosed 85 people with SZ, whereas the group using the DCM diagnosed 163 people with SZ, shows the difference in diagnosis rates
      • As the classification and diagnosis of SZ may have an issue  with reliability, there is also an issue with validity and the accuracy and lack of consistency of the diagnosis
        • Mistakes with either misdiagnosis or un-diagnosis may occur, meaning that you cannot back up a theory with unreliable data
    • Validity
      • SZ is difficult to diagnose accurately. Often people are misdiagnosed or go undiagnosed
      • Being certain that a diagnosis of SZ is accurate can be difficult because;
        • 2.Comorbidity - meaning SZ often exists alongside other psychiatric problems (commonly substance misuse - can be used to self medicate, or depression)
        • 1.Symptoms can easily be confused with other disorders .e.g. bipolar
        • 3.There is no objective test for it
      • Rosenhan's experiments
        • 1st Experiment; The Pseudo Patient Experiment
          • Staff failed to spot 8 pseudo patients, once labelled with SZ, much of their behaviour was interpreted as support for diagnosis .e.g feeling of grandeur working for a  well known psychologist. some had to take anti psychotic medication to be released
        • 2nd Experiment; Non-Existent Imposter
          • Told staff that he sent imposters to different over 3 months. 41/193 were considered imposters, however he did not send any
      • Once labelled SZ, everything someone does seems to exhibit SZ symptoms, meaning that it may be difficult for patients to live normally
    • Negative consequences of recieving a diagnosis
      • Feared and avoided due to stigma
      • Biological element means patients may see little hope for recovery and may become passive recipients of care
      • The Media's role of propagating the violence and SZ link
    • Positive consequences of receiving a diagnosis
      • Gives people access to treatment and an understanding of their problems
      • 'Was like a relief'
      • Untreated SZ can have poorer outcomes
    • Labelliing
      • Reasons the CASL want to abolish the SZ label
        • Often diagnosed wrongly as there is a lack of reliability, meaning that there is no real benefit of using the label
        • Damaging to those it is applied to as the disorder is mis-understood and implies dangerous and unpredictable nature.
        • Being diagnosed does not necessarily lead to successful treatment as the treatment may still not work
      • Farina et al
        • Study shows that the stereotype associated with SZ includes being less intelligent, being unpredictable, dangerous and dirty
      • This means that the consequence of the label SZ means that that many employers admit they would not knowingly employ someone with SZ

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Schizophrenia resources »