GNM tests 2-4
- Created by: Sootworth
- Created on: 22-11-16 15:33
View mindmap
- GNM
- Test 2
- 'What would RM with same skillset have done in the same situation?'
- Test 3
- RM must have foreseen a serious and obvious risk of death from the breach of duty
- Breach of duty caused death
- RM must have foreseen a serious and obvious risk of death from the breach of duty
- Test 4
- Breach of duty of care is so bad it should be considered criminal
- R v Bateman
- P must show evidence D disregarded the life and safety of V
- =GNM
- P must show evidence D disregarded the life and safety of V
- Andrews v DPP
- P must show a very high degree of negligence
- =GNM
- Where P can only prove a simple lack of care
- Not sufficient
- P must show a very high degree of negligence
- R v Bateman
- Risk
- Breach of duty of care is so bad it should be considered criminal
- R v Bateman
- P must show evidence D disregarded the life and safety of V
- =GNM
- P must show evidence D disregarded the life and safety of V
- Andrews v DPP
- P must show a very high degree of negligence
- =GNM
- Where P can only prove a simple lack of care
- Not sufficient
- P must show a very high degree of negligence
- R v Bateman
- R v Edwards
- D ignores obvious and serious danger
- or decided to take risk
- =GNM
- D ignores obvious and serious danger
- or decided to take risk
- =GNM
- =GNM
- or decided to take risk
- D ignores obvious and serious danger
- =GNM
- or decided to take risk
- D ignores obvious and serious danger
- R v Misra & Srivastava
- GN risked the death of V
- =GNM
- GN risked health
- not sufficient
- GN risked the death of V
- Breach of duty of care is so bad it should be considered criminal
- Breach of duty of care is so bad it should be considered criminal
- Test 2
Comments
No comments have yet been made