Functionalism: Differential educational achievement
- Created by: sarah_mocha
- Created on: 28-03-16 00:11
View mindmap
- Functionalism: explanations of differential educational achievement
- why can working-class students not reach the top?
- parents fail to prepare their children for school
- in essence, the working-class family is dysfunctional and it fails to transmit the right values and skills to its children
- they lack cultural support from the home
- Key study: Hyman
- working class families possess a distinctive sub-culture that is passed on through generations
- many members placed a limited value on education and gaining a high-status job
- Key study: Sugarman
- 1. working class develop a culture based on fatalism, immediate gratification and present-time orientation
- 2. working class jobs are monotonous and boring; workers have no control over their lives as they're told what to do and when to do it
- 3. they develop a culture in response to these jobs and develop immediate gratification
- 4. however, middle class jobs encourage workers to plan for the future and emphasise individualism
- 5. this cultural difference explains differential attainment as schools are based on middle class values rather than working class
- Key Sociologist: Bernstein
- 1. there are two language codes: elaborated code and restricted code
- 2. elaborated code = complex sentences, explicit meanings and a large vocabulary
- 3. restricted code = short sentences, shared meanings and a limited vocabulary
- 4. language codes are learnt primarily in the home. middle class have access to both restricted and elaborate, working class can only access restricted
- 5. the education system uses elaborated code, therefore working class students are disadvantaged
- Evaluation
- ignores the impact of poverty on attainment. also, it could be argued that the values of the working class may be a product of their poverty
- they may not value education because they have to earn money for their family or they may recognise that few escape poverty, and they're just being realistic
- ignores the impact of poverty on attainment. also, it could be argued that the values of the working class may be a product of their poverty
- why can working-class students not reach the top?
Comments
No comments have yet been made