factors affecting ewt
- Created by: evecrowley17
- Created on: 25-03-19 17:00
View mindmap
- FACTORS AFFECTING EWT
- LEADING Q
- research
- 45 student ps
- video + critical q: HOW FAST WAS THE CAR GOING WHEN IT HITCONTACTED/BUMPED/SMASHED
- smashed 40s vs contacted 31s (supports leading q)
- EVALUATION
- lab experiment-> lacks ecological validity (lacks emotional conditions of RL)
- but well controlled
- lacks pop validity
- further r.s.-> DID YOU SEE THE/A BROKEN HEADLIGHT? 2x more likely yes to 'the'
- 1w after diff students watched video, leading q w smashed more likely yes to broken headlight > hit
- r.l app. to CI e.g. reinstate context, avoid leading q
- lab experiment-> lacks ecological validity (lacks emotional conditions of RL)
- research
- POST-EVENT DISCUSSION
- research
- video of same crime diff pov then discussed
- 71% recalled events hadn't witnessed themselves
- EVALUATION
- lab experiment-> lacks ecological validity
- video of same crime diff pov then discussed
- research
- ANXIETY
- research
- negative
- pen, discussion, + oil vs knife, shouting, blood-> weapon focus/tunnel theory
- artifical
- pen, discussion, + oil vs knife, shouting, blood-> weapon focus/tunnel theory
- positive
- rl shooting, highest anxiety most accurate in recalling
- post event discussion, self report
- rl shooting, highest anxiety most accurate in recalling
- negative
- inverted U curve
- research
- LEADING Q
Comments
No comments have yet been made