Experiments Analysis
- Created by: Steven Bird
- Created on: 14-05-13 11:53
View mindmap
- Experiments
- Comparative
- V - If no research is carried out there is no causal relationship.
- R - Outdated research. Highly replicable.
- E - Durkheim
- E - Almost no ethical problems due to theoretic nature.
- R - Access to larger sample sizes.
- P - Only a theoretical approach. Can only study past events or pre-existing figures.
- T - Positivist method. Quantitative data.
- Field
- R - Difficult to replicate.
- T - Positivist nethod. Quantitative data.
- V - Higher levels of validity due to the natural environment.
- E - Need informed consent. Deception is often necessary to negate Hawthorne Effect.
- E - Rosehan.
- P - No control over variables.
- R - Larger samples than lab experiments due to larger spaces.
- Lab
- R - Highly replicable due to easy to control variables.
- R - Small samples due to time space constraints.
- E - Need informed consent. Deception is often necessary to negate Hawthorne Effect.
- T - Positivist method. Quantitative data.
- V - Lack of ecological validity.
- E - Milgram.
- P - High control over variables. Hard to investigate large samples.
- Comparative
- Lab
- R - Highly replicable due to easy to control variables.
- R - Small samples due to time space constraints.
- E - Need informed consent. Deception is often necessary to negate Hawthorne Effect.
- T - Positivist method. Quantitative data.
- V - Lack of ecological validity.
- E - Milgram.
- P - High control over variables. Hard to investigate large samples.
Comments
No comments have yet been made