Evaluation of piagets theory
- Created by: Jess
- Created on: 01-02-14 11:36
View mindmap
- Evaluation of piagets theory
- criticisms of theory
- too rigid, horizontal declarage, characteristics of more than 1 stage
- · Some of the concepts are vague, and the stages often show much overlap that development is perhaps better regarded as a continuous process.
- Overall, in many researchers’ view, he severely underestimated social influences on cognitive development. By concentrating on individual maturation and self-construction of mental life,
- argued against discovery learning and instead need guidance from adults and the importance of scaffolding
- Criticisms of method
- Piaget's use of the clinical interview method, informal experimentation, and small sample sizes, lacked scientific rigour
- he assumed that if a child didn't succeed at a task they lacked ability but may have been other reasons so wrong to assume
- A frequent criticism is that Piaget’s experiments were over-complicated and difficult to relate to
- positive evaluations
- Piaget’s views have had an important impact on educational practise – changing the way children are taught and hopefully making education more effective and enjoyable.
- Piaget’s theory has received a lot of longitudinal cross-sectional and cross-cultural support over many years, and while the theory has been subject to modification and criticism, many fundamental aspects of his theory are still accepted as valid contributions today.
- Piaget used clinical interviews to which he paid close attention meaning the results are rich and detailed
- criticisms of theory
Comments
No comments have yet been made