Evaluation: Zimbardo (1973): SPE

?
View mindmap
  • Evaluation: Zimbardo (1973): SPE
    • Participant control
      • Ppts volunteered to take part
      • Emotionally stable ppts were chosen
      • Ppts were randomly assigned to roles
      • Good representation of the target population
      • Easier to generalise results
      • Experiment has a higher validity
    • Reicher and Haslam (2006)
      • TV replication of SPE
      • Prisoners took over and dehumanised the guards
      • Social Identity Theory
        • Guards didn't develop a shared social identity
        • The prisoners did
      • Zimbardo's findings on conformity to social roles may not be valid
    • Ethical issues
      • Zimbardo's dual role in the study
        • Researcher
        • Prison super intendent
      • Overlooked guards abusive behaviour
      • Zimbardo conformed to his role
      • Ppts weren't protected from harm
        • Breaks moral code of the experement
        • Experimenter has a responsibility to protect ppts from harm
    • Low population validity
      • Androcentric and ethnocentric
      • All participants were white, male college students
      • Can't generalise to the rest of the population
      • Findings may not apply to:
        • Women
        • Older people
        • Different cultures or ethnicities

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Conformity resources »