Evaluation of Meeus and Raaijmakers' Obedience Study [12 marks]
Mind map for the description and evaluation of Meeus and Raaijmakers' study following Milgram's Obedience Study.
- Created by: Xanthe
- Created on: 06-12-13 10:22
View mindmap
- Evaluate Meeus and Raaijmakers' Study [12 marks]
- Evaluation
- Generalisability
- High
- Good representative sample
- High
- Reliability
- High
- Standardised procedure
- Was repeated
- High
- Application
- High
- Military, organised groups, court
- High
- Validity
- Experimental
- Low
- Several not sure/did not believe real
- Low
- Ecological
- Low
- Affected by circumstance
- Low
- Construct
- High
- Based off of Milgram's
- High
- Experimental
- Ethics
- More so than Milgram
- Ethical
- Consent
- Competence
- Debrief
- Unethical
- Right to withdraw effectively removed
- Decieved pps
- Ethical
- More so than Milgram
- Generalisability
- Description
- Aim
- Use more modern punishment
- 'Correct' Milgram's
- Procedure
- Scripted - responses and stress remarks
- Told need to apply pressure to job applicant - ask Qs with stress remarks given for wrong answers
- Seperate rooms - communicate over speaker
- Adverstised for pps, several papers, men and women
- Applicant fail test due to stress remarks
- Results
- 92% to end
- Some but limited moral strain
- Conculsion
- Will obey LA
- More likely if not physical
- less immediate impact
- More 'common' or 'accepted'
- Aim
- Evaluation
Comments
No comments have yet been made