Effects of institutionalisation- A01
- Created by: MollyL20
- Created on: 12-12-20 11:09
View mindmap
- Effects of institutionalisation- A01
- Research on maternal deprivation has turned to orphan studies as a means of studying the effects of deprivation. A tragic opportunity arose in the 1990s in Romania
- Former Nicolai Ceausescu required Romanian women to have 5 children. Most families couldn't afford to keep their children and they ended up in huge orphanages in very poor conditions. After the 1989 revolution, many children were adopted
- Rutter's ERA study
- Procedure
- Rutter et al (2011) have followed a group of Romanian orphans adopted in Britain to test what extent good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions
- Physical cognitive and emotional development has been assessed at ages 4, 6, 11 and 15 years. A group of 52 British children adopted around the same time have served as a control group
- Findings
- When they first arrived in the UK, half of the adoptees shows signs of delayed intellectual development and the majority were malnourished
- At age 11 the adopted children showed different rates of recovery related to he ages they were adopted. The mean IQ of the children adopted before the age of 6 months was 102 compared with the 86 for those adopted between 6 months and 2 years and 2 years+ their IQ being 77.These differences remained at the age 16 (Becket et al 2010).
- In terms of attachment, there appeared to be a difference in outcome related to whether adoption took place before or after 6 months. Symptoms include attention seeking, clinginess and social behaviour to both unfamiliar and familiar adults
- Procedure
- Bucharest Early Antiprevention project
- Procedure
- Zeanan et al (2005) assessed attachment in 95 children aged 12-31 months who had spent most of their lives in institutional care (90% on average). They were compared to a control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution
- The attachment type was measured using the Strange situation. In addition carers were asked about unusual social behaviours.
- Findings
- They found that 74% of the control group came out as securely attached. However, only 19% of the other group were attached, with 65% being classified as disorganised attachment
- The description of disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of institutionalised children as opposed to less than 20% of the controls
- Procedure
- Effects of institutionalisation
- Disinhibited attachment
- Equally friendly and affectionate towards people they know well or who are strangers
- Rutter (2006) has explained that it is an adaptation to living with multiple caregivers during the sensitive period for attachment formation
- In poor quality institutions, child might have 50 carers none of whom which they see enough to be bale to form an attachment
- Mental retardation
- In Rutter's study most children showed signs of retardation when they arrived in Britain
- Adopted before 6 months, caught up with the control group by age 4
- Intellectual development can be recovered provided adoption takes place before 6 months
- Disinhibited attachment
Comments
No comments have yet been made