Duty of Care
- Created by: Tom Ower
- Created on: 18-05-13 10:51
View mindmap
- Duty of Care
- Donoghue v Stevenson 1932
- Lord Atkin decided the case with the famous neighbour principle
- Caparo v Dickman 1990
- Was the damage or loss foreseeable?
- A reasonable person would have foreseen some harm or damage to claimant
- Kent v Griffiths 2000
- Is there sufficient proximity between wrongdoer and victim?
- Proximate in time, space or relationship
- Bourhill v Young 1943
- Mcloughlin v O'Brien 1983
- Proximate in time, space or relationship
- Is it fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care?
- Orange v Yorkshire Po Po 2000
- MPC v Reeves 2001
- Was the damage or loss foreseeable?
- Donoghue v Stevenson 1932
Comments
No comments have yet been made