Conceptual schemes Kant
- Created by: josie
- Created on: 11-12-12 20:59
View mindmap
- Implications of Conceptual schemes (Kant)
- Content/scheme
- Duck/rabbit example
- You see a duck then a rabbit or even a series of lines
- The only thing that is changing is the idea/scheme not the content.
- You see a duck then a rabbit or even a series of lines
- Duck/rabbit example
- Synthetic a priori knowledge
- Knowledge about the world known prior to experience
- Space and Time
- Needed for experience so cannot come from experience
- Impossible to have an experience that isn't in terms of space and time
- Needed for experience so cannot come from experience
- Schemes are universal so we can verify knowledge claims if they are in accordance with this universal conceptual scheme.
- Empiricism and rationalism reconciled
- Empiricism
- Right
- Raw materials for thought cn only come from experience
- Thinking would be impossible without the raw materials
- Thinking would be impossible without the raw materials
- Raw materials for thought cn only come from experience
- Wrong
- Wrong to think the mind is a Tabula Rasa
- Right
- Rationalism
- Right
- There are innate concepts and structures in the mind
- Wrong
- rong to think these ideas and structures mirror an bjective reality beyond our minds
- Right
- Aim
- Embrace the insights of both whilst rejecting the problems in each
- Kants synthesis
- "Form without content is empty. Content without form is blind"
- The raw materials we gaiin through experience need structure and order for us to make sense of them.
- Intelligible experience
- Empiricism
- Knowledge limited to Phenomenal world
- Cannot have experience without structure
- Can only know the world as it apears
- Phenomenal world
- Can only know the world as it apears
- World beyond our experience is unknowable
- Noumenal world
- World independantly of how it appears
- Noumenal world
- Can only have intelligible experience if it is filtered through a conceptual scheme
- Which has a set of necessary a priori structures and concepts built into it
- Space and time, Casuation, unity, manner and number
- Which has a set of necessary a priori structures and concepts built into it
- Cannot have experience without structure
- Content/scheme
- Synthetic a priori knowledge
- Knowledge about the world known prior to experience
- Space and Time
- Impossible to have an experience that isn't in terms of space and time
- Impossible to have an experience that isn't in terms of space and time
- Schemes are universal so we can verify knowledge claims if they are in accordance with this universal conceptual scheme.
- Empiricism and rationalism reconciled
- Empiricism
- Right
- Raw materials for thought cn only come from experience
- Raw materials for thought cn only come from experience
- Wrong
- Wrong to think the mind is a Tabula Rasa
- Right
- Rationalism
- Right
- There are innate concepts and structures in the mind
- Wrong
- rong to think these ideas and structures mirror an bjective reality beyond our minds
- Right
- Aim
- Embrace the insights of both whilst rejecting the problems in each
- Kants synthesis
- "Form without content is empty. Content without form is blind"
- The raw materials we gaiin through experience need structure and order for us to make sense of them.
- Intelligible experience
- Empiricism
Comments
Report
Report
Report
Report