comprehensive schools

  • Created by: cieran32
  • Created on: 12-05-18 20:25
View mindmap
  • comprehensive education
    • introduced during 1960s and 1970s
    • pressure for comprehensives came from Labour governments
    • all pupils in an area would attend the same school and have the same educational opportunities
    • pupils would have more opportunities to gain qualifications
    • to help break down the class barriers in society as one school for all pupils in a particular area meant that all social classes would be brought together
    • to remove the stigma of academic failure at age eleven
    • to remove the inequalities of the tri-tripartite system
    • criticisms
      • The new right claims comprehensive result in the 'dumbing down' of educational provision with the academically stronger being held back.
      • the comprehensive system is not actually 'comprehensive'. it was introduced at different times in different areas. Private schools undermined attempt to provide 'one school for all'
      • inequality continued within comprehensive schools through setting and streaming ' tri-partite system under one roof'
      • The comprehensive system did not create 'classless schools'  as schools reflected the socio economic make up of the catchment area
      • changes to do with education system in 1980s-90s reduced equal access to same educational opportunities
        • competition between schools allowing schools 'opt out' created differences between schools
    • strengths and achievements of comprehensive education
      • A much higher proportion of pupils have had the opportunity to obtain qualifications
      • pass rates in GCSE and A level have all risen.
      • it seems that brighter pupils are not held back in comprehensive schools
    • why have comprehensive schools failed to meet their original aims
      • original aims
        • to create more equal access to educational opportunity
        • to break down the class divisions in British society
      • reasons
        • some public opinion opposed comprehensive education. The new right claimed that academically capable pupils were held back in comprehensives.
        • Not all teachers all fully supported the comprehensive system and some found it difficult to adapt to the new range of pupils in their schools

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »