Changing family patterns cont
- Created by: hanasheady
- Created on: 05-05-16 18:53
View mindmap
- Changing family patterns cont
- Divorce
- Doubled in UK between 1961 and 69 and doubled again by 72
- Rate= 40% of all marriages will end in divorce
- Fewer people are getting married and are cohabiting instead
- 65% of petitions of divorce are from women, 1946= was 37%
- 1857= men could divorce unfaithful wives but women had to prove their husbands disloyalty + still expensive
- 1921= 3,000 divorces
- 1961= 27,000 divorces= 9x higher
- 1937- Grounds widened, including desertion and cruelty
- 1923- Grounds for divorce equalised for men/women
- 1949- Legal aid available= affordable
- 1969- Divorce law reform act= irretrievable breakdown sole ground for divorce. Divorce available after 2 years agreed separation and 5 if only one spouse wants it
- 1984- Could divorce after 1 year rather than 3
- 2004- Civil Partnership Act allows for legal dissolution of a civil partnership on same grounds as marriage
- 2007- Appeal Court ruling, in divorce settlements equality applies, 50-50 split of all salaries and pension rights
- 2014- Same -sex marriages became law. are grounds for divorce as normal marriage
- Feminist explanations-dual burden-double/triple shift= new conflict with husband
- Arlie Hochschild- Women feel valued at work compare with at home, mens continuing resistance to do housework= frustration
- Both working= less time/energy to resolve any problems
- Jessie Bernard- women feel dissatisfaction with patriarchal marriage, accepting feminist ideas: becoming more conscious of patriarchal oppression and more confident to reject it
- Arlie Hochschild- Women feel valued at work compare with at home, mens continuing resistance to do housework= frustration
- Modernity & individualisation- Individuals are unwilling to remain with a partner if the relationship fails to deliver personal fulfilment.
- Giddiness- They seek a 'pure relationship'- one that exists to satisfy each others needs and not of of duty/tradition or for sake of children.
- Meaning of high divorce rate
- The New Right- Undesirable= undermines marriage= total to social stability. High divorce rate= female lone parents= burden on state= boys lack male role model= results in poorer health and educational outcomes
- Feminists- Desirable= means women are breaking free from oppression of the patriarchal nuclear family
- Postmodernists and the individualists- shows individuals they now have freedom= major cause of greater family diversity
- Functionalists- Not a threat just a result of peoples higher expectations
- Interactionists- David Morgan= We cannot generalise as every individuals meaning is different
- The personal life perspective- divorce can cause financial difficulties epcecially with women & cause lack of daily contact with children and non- resident parents
- Doubled in UK between 1961 and 69 and doubled again by 72
- Desertion- On partner leaves the other but the couple remain legally married
- Legal separation- A court separates the financial and legal affairs of the couple but where they remain married and are not free to re-marry
- Empty shell marriage- Couple continue to live under the same roof but remain married in name only
- Reasons for changing patterns of marriage
- Changing attitudes to marriage- Less pressure to marry and more freedom to choose what type of relationship they want - norm that everyone ought to get married has greatly changed
- Declining stigma attached to alternatives to marriage- cohabitation, remaining single, having children outside of marriage= doesn't lead to a 'shot gun wedding'
- 'Couples who want children should get married' - 1989= 70% yes 2012-42%
- Secularisation
- Changes in position of women
- Fear of divorce
- Reasons for increase in cohabitation
- Decline in stigma attached to sex outside of marriage. 1989- 44% pre-marital sex is not wrong, 2012- 65%
- Untitled
- Young more likely+ if atheist
- Increased career opportunities for women= need financial security of marriage less
- A trial marriage, leading to marriage
- Attempt to create a more personally negotiated and equal relationship than conventional patriarchal marriage
- Shelton and John- women who cohabit do less housework than their married counterparts
- One-person households
- By 2033 over 30% of the adult population will be single
- Reasons for changes
- Increase in separation= mostly men under 65 smother gets custody
- Trends towards marrying later and decline in marrying= people remaining single
- Creative singlehood
- Too few partners in same age group eg. older widows
- Simon Duncan & Miranda Phillips- 1/10 adults are in significant relationship but not married or cohabiting- accounts for half of those classed as single
- Trend towards less formalised relationships
- Duncan and Phillips- sometimes as they could not afford to
- Wanted to keep their own home
- Too early to cohabit
- 20% see 'living apart together' as their ideal relationship
- Childbearing
- Predicted that 1/4 of those born in 1973 will be childless at 45
- Reasons for change- only 28% of 25-34 yr olds think marriage should come before parenthood
- Women having children later
- Reasons that lone-parent families tend to be headed by women
- Widespread belief that women are by nature suited to an expressive/nurturing role
- Courts usually give mother custody
- Men might be less willing ti give up work to care for children
- May wish to be single= Jean Renvoize- professional women were able to support their children without the fathers involvement
- Elis Cashmore- working class mothers chose to love on welfare benefits without a partner as they had experienced abuse
- Lone parenthood and the welfare state
- New right thinker, Charles Murray= the growth of lone parent families is due to an over generous welfare state providing benefits
- Has created a reverse incentive= rewarding irresponsible behaviour, having children without being able to provide for them
- Welfare share creates a dependency culture- people assume the state will help them + their children
- Solution= abolish welfare benefits= reduce dependency culture that encourages birth outside marriage
- Critics: Lone parents families more likely to be in poverty because:
- Lack of affordable childcare prevents lone parents from working, 60% of them are unemployed..2x higher than women with partners
- Inadequate welfare benefits
- Women earn less than men; most likely to be head of lone parent family
- Failure of fathers to pay maintenance,especially if they have formed a second family that they have to support
- Critics: Lone parents families more likely to be in poverty because:
- Solution= abolish welfare benefits= reduce dependency culture that encourages birth outside marriage
- Welfare share creates a dependency culture- people assume the state will help them + their children
- Has created a reverse incentive= rewarding irresponsible behaviour, having children without being able to provide for them
- New right thinker, Charles Murray= the growth of lone parent families is due to an over generous welfare state providing benefits
- Reasons for patterns- stepfamilies=
- Are a result of lone parent families+ increase in divorce+separation
- Women mostly have children from previous relationship 85% (compared to men 11%) as women usually get custody
- Greater risk of poverty because often more children from previous relationships= father has to take care of double children
- The Beanpole family- Bell= Particular type of extended family
- Julia Brannen- long and thin= extended vertically- through three or more generations= grandparents, parents and children
- Not extended horizontally- doesn't involve unces/aunts/cousins etc
- Sharp decline inn support and contact between siblings= suggests beanpole
- Not extended horizontally- doesn't involve unces/aunts/cousins etc
- May be result of increased life expectancy, more surviving= more contact
- Or due to smaller family sizes, means people have fewer siblings and fewer horizontal lines
- Obligations to relatives- despite beanpole families, people still feel obligation to help their wider kin.
- For example, Janet Finch and Jennifer Mason- 90% people had given or received financial helped and half had cared for a sick relative
- Finch and Mason- more expected from females with helping parents when partner not available= caregivers
- Men/son more likely to help financially
- Julia Brannen- long and thin= extended vertically- through three or more generations= grandparents, parents and children
- Divorce
Similar Sociology resources:
Teacher recommended
Teacher recommended
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made