Attachment
- Created by: Hema
- Created on: 26-04-15 19:33
View mindmap
- Attachment
- Learning Theory
- attachment is learned - NURTURE
- people are born as blank slates + all behaviour is learnt
- classical conditioning- child associates carer with pleasure of needs being met
- FOOD (unconditioned stimulus) = PLEASURE (unconditioned response) - mother is associated with pleasure (conditioned stimulus)
- WEAKNESS: Harlow - found that when newborn monkeys were sperated from mother + put with 2 wire mothers - one with bottle and just wire and one with cloth and no bottle - monkey spent most time with cloth
- WEAKNESS: learning theory explains simple behaviours but attachment is vey complex so cannot be explained by this
- Bowlby's Evolutionary Explanation
- children are biologically pre-programmed to form attachments - NATURE
- Lorenz - found that attachment is innate in young ducklings so has a survival value
- aids survival - attachment behaviours are activated when separated from mother (a direct threat to survival)
- also parents instinctively protect children during critical period - a window when attachment must occur - if not must develop relationship by 12 months
- bowlby says most babies display monotropy - showing an innate tendency to attach to one adult (the person who provides them with emotional security)
- mother-child relationship is important for future relationships
- STRENGTH:Hazen + Shaver found that there was a strong correlation with childhood attachment and adult relationships - children follow relationship templates into later life
- WEAKNESS: Rutter et al found that adoption studies show kids can form attachment bonds outside critical period
- Individual Differences: Ainsworth + Bell
- developed strange situation to see how children differ in attachment.
- Lab experiment - structured interviews
- 100 American middle class infants (9-18months)
- SECURE- 66% use mother as safe base, avoidant of stranger, distressed when mum leaves, happy on return
- Observe: Willingness to explore, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, reunion behaviour
- INSECURE AVOIDANT: 22% Happy to explore, okay with stranger, no separation anxiety, little interest on return
- INSECURE RESISTANT 12% - Explores less than others, avoids stranger, intense distress on separation, rushes to her on return but gets angry + resists contact.
- WEAKNESS: low ecological validity, controlled, artificial, unlikely to happen in real life
- WEAKNESS: low population validity - male American middle-class
- STRENGTH: reliable, easy to repeat
- Cultural Differences
- Grossman et al - used strange situation to test german children + found 49% insecure avoidants, 33% secure attachment (compared to America -22% + 66%)
- Van ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - conducted meta analysis of 32 studies of attachment - 8 different countries - found diference between cultures were small, secure was most common in every one
- Kyoung - Korean infants didn't want to stay close to mums and on return - mothers more likely to play with infant - so different childrearing strategies can lead to secure attachment
- Disruption of Attachment: BOWLBY
- Aim: identify the effects of disruption of attachment
- Naturalistic observations of children ages 1 - 4 years. one was john 17 months old put in residential nursery while mum as in hospital
- over 9 days he went from happy to so distressed that on renion wh mum he rejected her
- johns distress was because of: loss of mother, strange environment, new routines, multiple care takers, lack of mum sub
- in conclusion most young children who experienced separation suffer severe, short term distress
- effects f disruption: PDD:
- Despair- become calmer, show little interest in anything + self comfort too.
- Protest- initial response at being left show distress, fear and anger.
- Detachment- coping with separation, more interested in surroundings emotionally unresponsive, avoid new attachments no interest on mums return
- STRENGTH: There are practical applications - led to changes in hospital rules regarding children staying over, nurses also had regular contact with kids
- WEAKNESS: observer bias - behaviour is subjected and researchers may have interpreted it in the way they wanted to
- WEAKNESS: Boys react more strongly to separation than girls so there are individual differences
- Privation + Institutional care HODGES + TIZARD
- Aim- to investigate whether a lack of emotional care had permanent and irreversible effects on emotional and social development
- 65 children institutionalised before 4 months old - it had a policy no caretakers to form attachments (privation)
- Children, parents + teachers interviewed about behaviours and attitudes
- at age of 4 - 15 were returned to mum and dad + 24 were adopted
- at 8 - interviewed mum + again at 16 + children aswell at 16
- at 4 + 8 children tend to be over friendly and seek attention from adults rather than peers + more approval seeking and less popular with peers
- at 16 most adopted mums say the kid is deeply attached - half bio mums said kid was deeply attached
- kids who suffered privation had more problems with siblings than control group
- it is possible for children who suffer privation in first years of life to make close and lasting attachments later but depends on adults too
- WEAKNESS: attrition - longitudinal study - gradually drop out, reducing sample size so less representive so un-generalisable
- WEAKNESS: natural experiment - lacks control over ex variables, so cannot establish cause n effect - low int validity
- Day Care + Aggression
- NICHD - longitudinal study, america, 100 children, diverse families, 10 locations, assessed regularly, by 5- more time spent at day car - more aggressive
- EGELAND + HEISTER - securely attached - react negative to day care - insecure attachement responded well. indiv diffs
- BORGE ET AL - maternal questionaire on 3431 canadian mums w/ kids ages 2-4, families matched, agg is more common in kids raised at home, especially if mum had low education and low socio-economic status
- WEAKNESS: attrition longitudinal study, reduce sample size, low representive
- WEAKNESS questionaire demand characteristics - social desirability
- Day Care on Peer Relations
- Shea - naturalistic observation, recording 3 - 4 year olds in playground during first 10 weeks at nursery, found a decrease in distance from nearest child and decrease in aggression, increase in peer social interactions
- Gunnar et al - measured cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and found day care was more challenging for less sociable kids
- WEAKNESSDiLalla - corellation - doesnt establish cause and effect maybe 3rd variable
- DiLalla - compared the amount of time children spend in day care to levels of pro-social behaviour, found a negative correlation. kids in day care are less sociable
- STRENGTHSGunnar et al - uses cortisol levels to measure stress - objective so easy to replicate - reliable
- Learning Theory
Comments
No comments have yet been made