Arguments for/against Somatic Cell therapy

View mindmap

The money could be used for tackling poverty
- A lot of money is spent on these resources
Arguments for/against Somatic Cell therapy
- Against
  - Concern is that those developing the techniques might have mixed motives
    - Wanting to be the first to develop something new and famous
  - Very risky-may be dangerous side effects
  - Is it compassionate to give treatment whose long term success is unknown
  - Some individual Christians oppose it although they accept its intentions are good
  - A lot of money is spent on these resources
  - Jesus did not heal everyone who was sick, and there are still limits today
  - Could lead to legalisation of designer babies
  - It may only be a short term saving of life
  - The money could be used for tackling poverty
- For
  - It is an extension of Jesus' healing ministry that is now the responsibility of his followers
  - It is an act of compassion
  - It saves life
  - The benefits outweigh the risks
  - It is less expensive than current treatments, so shows good stewardship of limited resources
  - Development and refinement of the technique is a responsible use of God given skills
  - How can a price be put on the life of a child
  - Strictly regulated by the HFEA
  - Mainstream Churches, including Roman Catholics regard it as morally acceptable
    - since it is aimed at healing the individual

Get Revising