Arguments for the existence of God
- Created by: grxcechild
- Created on: 04-04-18 12:52
View mindmap
- Arguments for the existence of God
- A priori (logic)
- The Ontological Argument
- St. Anselm- 11th century -Proslogium (1077–1078) Chapters 2–4 & Responsio to Gaunilo.
- The proposition ‘God exists’ is a priori or deductive
- In the proposition ‘God exists’, the subject ‘God’ contains the predicate
‘exists’, so God must exist
- God’s existence is a necessary truth, not a contingent one.
- In the proposition ‘God exists’, the subject ‘God’ contains the predicate
‘exists’, so God must exist
- wrote On Behalf of the Fool
- God is 'a being than which nothing greater can be conceived.’
- Crticisms: Gaunilo
- 'perfect lost island'
- reductio ad absurdum, Latin for ‘argument to absurdity’
- Responsio: shows that necessary existence is a predicate only of God, and not of things.
- Criticisms: Kant
- Existence is not a predicate
- We can accept the proposition that ‘existing necessarily’ is part of what we mean by ‘God’, but it does not follow from this that God exists in reality.
- 'perfect lost island'
- Strengths:
- It's a deductive argument, so if it succeeds, it is a proof of the existence of God.
- Karl Barth- not intended as a proof but the result of a religious experience given to Anselm in which God revealed his nature as: ' that than which nothing greater can be conceived’
- useful - distinguishing between analytic/synthetic and necessary/contingent beings
- The Ontological Argument
- A posteriori (sense)
- The Teleological Argument
- William Paley- Natural Theology- 1743-1805
- Watch analogy
- Inductive reasoning
- use premises to supply strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion.
- Based on observation: complexity, regularity & purpose
- Evidence of design = must be a designer
- Criticisms: Hume
- Could've been a lesser being
- Evil&suffering= a limited designer
- Anthropromorphic
- Multiverse theory
- Strengths:
- Swinburne argues that: 'simplicity is always evidence for truth’
- Evil is unavoidable - FWD
- Compatible with evolution
- Paley’s argument is good because it is based on induction
- William Paley- Natural Theology- 1743-1805
- The Cosmological Argument
- St. Thomas Aquinas 1225–1274
- Criticisms: Hume and Russell
- R- commits the fallacy of composition
- Response: Bruce Reichenbach- the whole has the same qualities as the parts
- H: the statements about God having a necessary existence are synthetic not analytic
- Response: God is metaphysically necessary
- R: the universe is the necessary being
- Response: The case for necessarily-existing matter is no stronger than the case for a necessarily existing mind.
- R- commits the fallacy of composition
- Criticisms: Hume and Russell
- Way 3
- observation that all things in the universe are contingent
- something must exist necessarily (outside of the universe)
- Inductie reasoning
- observation that all things in the universe are contingent
- observation of the cosmos convinced him that its basic processes did not explain themselves
- Galaxies, stars, planets, moons: all things in the universe move and are changed, and those changes are the result of cause and effect.
- St. Thomas Aquinas 1225–1274
- The Teleological Argument
- A priori (logic)
Comments
No comments have yet been made