1964-70 British History FP

?
  • Created by: H@r/3y
  • Created on: 29-09-20 15:36
View mindmap
  • Foreign Policy 1964-70
    • 'special relationship'
      • Wilson=pro-american, supporter of atlantic alliance
      • cold war was ongoing
        • wanted to ensure US stayed committed to defending europe
          • possible soviet threat highlighted by invasion of czechoslovakia to stop communist regime from being diluted there
        • vietnam strained relationship
          • begun 1955, support escalated after 1964. ended 1975
          • from escalation LBJ wanted support and approval from US allies
            • Aussies sent troops and LBJ wanted GB to do same
            • Wilson resisted direct involvement despite good relationship
              • difficult balancing act for wilson: wanted to keep Atlantic Alliance , but the war was very unpopular in GB
              • -especially with left so risked losing politiacl support if too for it
              • also couldnt really afford military involvement
          • GB couldn't afford but needed US  support to support value of sterling and avoid devaluation-couldn't alienate US
          • in end policy= giving moral support without military support
            • annoyed US-wanted more backing; and Labour MPs/supporters who wanted labour gov to condemn the US
    • Europe and EEC
      • Labour gov into power 1964- not committed to carry on Tory policy of EEC entry
      • 1962, Gaitskell fought against the first application telling party conference;
        • 'it would be the end of a thousand years of history'
        • opposition= based on fear the EEC was a step towards a federal political union
      • many on labour left (Michael Foot/Barbara Castle) and unions= hostile
        • saw it as club for capitalists, preventing GB from following socialist policies
      • BUT also some Europhiles (Roy Jenkins/ George Brown)
        • Brown= foreign secretary in 1966
      • Wilson= ambivalent. preferred Atlantic Alliance and stronger CW links, but saw strengths of EEC economically. Also contious to keep labour united on issue
      • By 1966, wilson= more convinced of economic arguments
        • October, his cabinet agreed to back new application- prospectus of success weren't good
          • bid seemed half hearted due to labour doubts
          • De Gaulle still President-little sign of mind change
          • Due to poor chance, Lleft opposers didnt feel need to voice their discontent too much
      • Wilson and Brown- Paris Jan 1967. Thought went well. Toured other countires for support.
        • June 1967- back to Paris. Gaulle put him on spot over detaching from 'special relationship'
          • Wilson wouldnt do this- November rejected again
    • Decolonisation
      • Withdrawal 'East of Suez'
        • Withdrawl accelerated after devaluation in 1967 and spending cuts that followed in 1968- Roy Jenkins
          • troops pulled out of Aden, Arabian Gulf, Malaysia, Singapore by end of 1971
          • dispite wishes of wilson and Healey- developing high-tech warplane TSR2 were abandoned
      • Rhodesia
        • Mac made speech in cape town to target white minority regimes who thought they could resist reform- not the colonial people who wanted independence
          • regimes- not persuaded, and speech seen as challenge/ threat
        • 1963, federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland broke up into three seperate entities
          • 1964, N Rhodesia became new independent state of Zambie; Nyasaland -independent Malawi
            • S hoped for independence but GB made clear it couldnt happen until majority rule replaced political domination by whites.
              • (1961 S. Africa rejected majority rule idea, left CW, towards more apartheid system where strict segregation between whites and non-whites)
        • Ian Smith became PM, 1965 and issued a Unilateral Declaration of Independence for Rhodesiawithout accepting majority rule= political row
          • his actions directly challenged L gov
          • Wilson hoped to reach conclusion quickly by oil sanctions/negotiations
            • met on HMS TIger Dec 1966- seemed to go well but Smith disavowed everything when he got back
            • 1967, oil sanctions didnt work either = frustration with wilson
              • too easy for rhodesia to get supplies through Portuguese colony of Mozambique and big companies ignored policy
              • S Africa continued trade with Rhodesia
            • talks on HMS Fearless Oct 1968 made Smith seem stronger not weaker
              • he also believed he had support of right of conservative Party and just needed to wait for GB to give in
            • Wilson's diplomacy got nowhere, situation upset CW and many Labour left. Also made britain look weak.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all the making of modern britain resources »